Question

A law limiting soft money political contributions
A. was upheld by the Supreme Court because political contributions are not a form of speech.
B. was upheld by the Supreme Court because it regulated only the source of money, not the amount that a candidate could spend.
C. was held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court because it interfered with a political candidate's right to campaign.
D. None of the above; the Court refused to rule on the issue holding that it was a political
question.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.