Question

Amber Blue owns a small hotel of the "bed & breakfast" variety. Hunter Greene, a tenant at Blue's bed & breakfast, sustained severe physical injuries when an intruder broke into Greene's room and attacked him with a baseball bat. The intruder neither was an employee of Blue's nor otherwise had any connection with the bed & breakfast. Green filed a tort action against Blue in an effort to collect damages for the medical expenses, lost earnings, and pain and suffering he experienced as a result of the intruder's attack. Greene argued that owners of commercial property such as a bed & breakfast are liable, as a matter of law, whenever guests are injured while on the premises. Blue argued that such property owners cannot be held liable when the guest's injuries were directly (and criminally) inflicted by a third-party attacker. Evaluate the arguments made, respectively, by Greene and Blue. Explain your supporting reasoning.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 884 characters.