Question

Assume that two firms (Firm A and Firm B) operate in the U.S. steel industry. The owner of Firm A writes the following letter to the owner of Firm B:

Dear Owner of Firm B,

I have concluded that if we both restrict output such that we each produce only 3 million tons of steel per year, we can both charge a price that will allow us to effectively monopolize the steel market and to maximize our joint profits. If you would like to enter into this agreement with me, please draft a contract that specifies this agreement and I will be more than willing to meet with you and sign it.

Sincerely,

Owner of Firm A

If this letter were sent in the year 1944, the

a. owner of Firm A would be guilty of violating antitrust laws because he or she merely attempted to monopolize the steel industry.

b. owner of Firm A would be guilty of violating antitrust laws only if he or she met with the owner of Firm B and signed the contract, but the owner of Firm A would be not guilty if the attempt to monopolize the market failed because the owner of Firm B never responded to the letter.

c. owners of both Firm A and Firm B would not be guilty of violating antitrust laws because antitrust laws in 1944 applied only to industries made up of three or more firms.

d. owners of both Firm A and Firm B would not be guilty of violating antitrust laws because antitrust laws in 1944 contained exceptions for certain nationally important industries like the steel industry.

e. owners of both Firm A and Firm B would not be guilty of anything because there were no antitrust laws in existence in 1944.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 57 characters.