Question

Because of lack of state action, the Supreme Court refused to find a violation of the Equal
Protection Clause when
A. a deputy sheriff, hired by a private park to provide security, enforced a discriminatory policy of the park excluding blacks.
B. a privately owned restaurant, which leased space from the state in a publicly owned building, refused to serve blacks.
C. a private club, which had a liquor license issued by the state, discriminated against blacks.
D. None of the above; the Court found state action in all of these situations.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.