Question

Chloe took her watch to a jeweler to have it repaired. While the jeweler had possession of the watch, a thief broke into the shop. The thief stole Chloe's watch and other items of jewelry. Which of the following is true?

A. Because this was a bailment for the benefit of the jeweler, the jeweler is strictly liable to Chloe for the value of the watch.

B. This was a mutual benefit bailment, meaning that the jeweler is liable to Chloe if he did not use reasonable care to protect the watch.

C. No bailment existed between Chloe and the jeweler.

D. Because this was a bailment for the benefit of Chloe, the jeweler cannot be held liable to her.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 84 characters.