Accounting
Anthropology
Archaeology
Art History
Banking
Biology & Life Science
Business
Business Communication
Business Development
Business Ethics
Business Law
Chemistry
Communication
Computer Science
Counseling
Criminal Law
Curriculum & Instruction
Design
Earth Science
Economic
Education
Engineering
Finance
History & Theory
Humanities
Human Resource
International Business
Investments & Securities
Journalism
Law
Management
Marketing
Medicine
Medicine & Health Science
Nursing
Philosophy
Physic
Psychology
Real Estate
Science
Social Science
Sociology
Special Education
Speech
Visual Arts
Question
Consider this rule-utilitarian argument against legalizing euthanasia: Passing a law to permit
active voluntary euthanasia would inevitably lead to abuses such as more frequent use of
nonvoluntary euthanasia and unnecessary killing; therefore, no such law should be passed.
Such an argument is characterized as
a. abductive. c. a slippery slope.
b. Kantian. d. equivocation.
Answer
This answer is hidden. It contains 67 characters.
Related questions
Q:
A common utilitarian argument in favor of capital punishment is that the death penalty
a. prevents the criminal from striking again.
b. reduces the severity of crimes.
c. makes the general public feel safe.
d. is endorsed by all religions.
Q:
What is a major difference between descriptive ethics and normative ethics?
a. Normative ethics concerns moral beliefs, whereas descriptive ethics concerns moral behaviors.
b. Normative ethics implies that some peoples moral beliefs are incorrect, whereas descriptive ethics does not.
c. Descriptive ethics cannot be done properly before doing normative ethics.
d. Descriptive ethics is not a scientific topic of study, whereas normative ethics is.
Q:
In arguments over abortion, both the conservative and the liberal agree that
a. abortion is the killing of an innocent person.
b. abortion before birth would not be the killing of an innocent person.
c. it is wrong to kill an innocent person.
d. the unborn is not a person until birth.
Q:
Chinese parents who argue that aborting female fetuses prevents economic harm to the family,
and should be allowed, would be using a(n) ________ argument.
a. Kantian c. ethical egoist
b. utilitarian d. legal
Q:
In Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
a. all abortions at any stage of pregnancy are permissible.
b. in the first three months of pregnancy, a state may regulate (but not ban) abortion; after viability, a state may forbid abortions, even those necessary to preserve the health or life of the woman.
c. in the first three months of pregnancy, the womans right to an abortion is unrestricted; after this period, a state may regulate and even forbid abortions.
d. in the first three months of pregnancy, the womans right to an abortion is unrestricted; after this period, a state may regulate (but not ban) abortion; after viability, a state may regulate and even forbid abortions, except when abortion is necessary to preserve the health or life of the woman.
Q:
Making the production and sale of drugs no longer a punishable crime is called ________.
Q:
One reason to support a harm-reduction drug policy is that criminalization of drugs has disproportionately affected minorities.
Q:
The deliberate termination of a pregnancy by surgical or medical (with drugs) means is known
generally as
a. therapeutic abortion. c. abortion, or induced abortion.
b. trimester abortion. d. spontaneous abortion.
Q:
The role played in moral theories of the principle of ________, which says that from the moral point of view, all persons are considered equal and should be treated accordingly, is called into question by feminist ethicists.
Q:
Drug addiction is defined as an intense craving for the drug and compulsive, uncontrolled use
of the drug despite harm done to the user or other people.
Q:
Unlike Kant, who maintained that reason is all that is necessary for making moral decisions, feminist ethicists insist that emotion should play a role, too.
Q:
Multivitamins are considered a drug, as defined by doctors, nurses, and medical researchers.
Q:
Alan Goldman says that the conventional view of sexuality is that sexual behavior must have
a morally significant goal, such as procreation. But he argues that
a. sex is directed towards goals but not toward conventional goals.
b. sex is not a means to some other goal.
c. sex should be directed toward communicating ideas or expressing love.
d. sex is a spiritual journey.
Q:
An unmarried man and woman have frequent sex and engage in activities that most of society
would label unconventional, unnatural, and deviant. Their sexual behavior results in the
greatest net good for all concerned. A utilitarian would therefore say that their sexual
activities are
a. permissible except for deviant sex.
b. permissible except for activities labeled unnatural.
c. impermissible.
d. permissible.
Q:
The difference between hypothetical and categorical imperatives is that
a. hypothetical imperatives are universal, whereas categorical imperatives are not.
b. hypothetical imperatives are rational and categorical imperatives are conditional.
c. hypothetical imperatives are absolutist, whereas categorical imperatives are not.
d. hypothetical imperatives are conditional, whereas categorical imperatives are unconditional.
Q:
Kissing someone without first obtaining consent is an example of
a. rape. c. both rape and sexual assault.
b. sexual assault. d. neither rape nor sexual assault.
Q:
The notion that as long as basic moral standards are respected, any sexual activity engaged in
by informed, consenting adults is permissible is known as the ________ view.
a. hedonistic c. liberal
b. conventional d. moderate
Q:
In a recent public opinion poll, ________ percent of respondents said they believe that it is
morally acceptable for a man and woman to have sex before marriage.
a. 90 c. 25
b. 66 d. 40
Q:
John Stuart Mill called the utilitarian principle, by which all actions can be judged, the
________ principle.
Q:
The ethical theory that says that the right action is the one that advances ones own best interests is called ________.
Q:
The nonconsequentialist answer to the question Why are racists wrong? is that they hurt people.
Q:
The philosopher Thomas Hobbes says that people are naturally
a. greedy, selfish, violent, self-destructive, and desperate.
b. compassionate, generous, and considerate.
c. eager to believe in a religious doctrine.
d. lazy and unambitious.
Q:
Rule-utilitarianism has been accused of being internally inconsistent because the theory can
a. easily lapse back into act-utilitarianism. c. always fall back on rigid rules.
b. be defended through act-utilitarianism. d. never be understood.
Q:
Some philosophers, known as race skeptics, believe that race has a physical scientific
basis and argue that the concept of race should be the main focus of science.
Q:
Scientific racism refers to a school of thought that held that (1) humanity can indeed be
divided into separate and distinct races, (2) race enables us to explain the most basic
differences among people, and (3) some races are superior to others.
Q:
According to one argument, when blacks get preferential treatment in employment some
white males end up losing outeven though these whites had no part in past racism and
may have never discriminated against anyone. Supporters of preferential hiring practices
will say that
a. these policies will actually benefit white males and minorities equally.
b. all white males are actually racist, even if they dont mean to be.
c. the injustice to white males makes amends for past injustices to minorities.
d. white males benefit from a history of policies that discriminate against minorities.
Q:
The fundamental moral issue involved in the health care debate is justice, which is about
persons getting what is fair or what is their due. One of the ways we can ensure justice in
health care is to preserve the principle that requires that equals be treated equally unless there
is a morally relevant reason for treating them differently. This principle is called
a. egalitarianism. c. the means-ends principle.
b. the greatest happiness principle. d. impartiality.
Q:
If someone argues that euthanasia is permissible because it maximizes happiness, she would
be taking a ________ view of the matter.
Q:
Both objectivists and cultural relativists agree that
a. the truth of moral judgments depends on whether ones culture approves of them.
b. moral judgments differ from culture to culture.
c. moral judgments do not differ from culture to culture.
d. the truth of moral judgments does not depend on whether ones culture approves of them.
Q:
A plausible nonconsequentialist argument for pacifism is
a. war is always wrong because in the deliberate killing of human beings it violates a fundamental rightthe right to life.
b. war is never justified, because it always produces more bad than good. The catastrophic loss of life and the widespread destruction of war can never offset whatever political
or material gains are achieved; riches, land, oil, or power cannot outweigh the carnage.
c. war inevitably leads to more war, and multiple wars can never outweigh the good that might come out of so many conflicts.
d. the loss of even one life in a war is so catastrophically bad that no amount of good resulting from the war could counterbalance it.