Question

In Arthur Anderson LLP v. United States, the court examined the meaning of the term "corruptly persuades" with regard to the company's order to shred documents and determined:
A.An order to shred documents constitutes corrupt persuasion even when there is no knowledge that the documents would be material to a subsequent proceeding.
B.An order to shred documents constitutes corrupt persuasion only when there is knowledge that the documents would be material to a subsequent proceeding.
C.A company can never be guilty of corrupt persuasion when having employees perform an act within the employee's job description or responsibilities.
D.Corrupt persuasion can only occur if an action is taken or ordered after a proceeding is started but not while the proceeding is only foreseen.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 2 characters.