Question

In Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut:
A.The plaintiff was successful because the defendant's taking of their land violated the Public Takings Clause of the Constitution.
B.The plaintiff was successful because the defendant was not taking the property for a valid public use.
C.The defendant was successful because the court declined to second guess the City's judgment regarding the efficacy of its development plan or the city's determination as to what land it needs in order to effectuate the project.
D.The defendant was successful because the court determined that economic development was not true public use or purpose.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 2 characters.