Question

In Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., when Leegin refused to sell their products to PSKS because PSKS sold Leegin's belts below the price established by Leegin and agreed to by PSKS, the court found:
A.Horizontal price restraints should be analyzed under a rule of reason theory.
B.Horizontal price restraints should be analyzed under a per se illegality theory.
C.Vertical pricing restraints should be analyzed under a rule of reason theory.
D.Vertical pricing restraints should be analyzed under a per se illegality theory.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 2 characters.