Question

In Meyer v. Holley, the Holley's, an interracial couple, claimed to have been discriminated against and sued under the Fair Housing Act, naming the real estate agent, the real estate agency and Meyer, the president and sole owner of the agency as defendants. This case examined whether Meyer could be held vicariously liable and the court said:
A.Meyer was not liable because the Fair Housing Act specifically and totally excluded vicarious liability from its coverage.
B.Meyer was liable because his right to control the company extended to include right to control agents which is enough to establish liability under respondeat superior.
C.Meyer was not liable because his right to control agents was not sufficient to establish liability under respondeat superior.
D.Meyer was liable because the Fair Housing Act included provisions for special circumstances extending traditional vicarious liability rules past the corporation to include the officers.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 2 characters.