Question

In Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E Webb Development Co., Spur Industries operated a feedlot well outside of the nearest city limits. When Del Webb bought land near Spur and developed a housing development they sought to have Spur moved or closed as a nuisance. The court decide that:
A.Since Del Webb and the subsequent individual land owners moved to the nuisance, Spur won because they had done nothing wrong.
B.Spur could be closed down and suffer the loss because they were creating the nuisance and one company can't stand in the way of progress.
C.Spur could stay in business at the same location but had to pay damages to the landowners for the diminished value of their land.
D.Spur could be ordered closed or would have to move but Del Webb was required to indemnify Spur for their losses and costs.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 2 characters.