Question

In this pair of cases, the first may serve as precedent for the second. Decide whether the second case is so relevantly similar to the first that it should be decided identically. Explain your decision.
First case: A court has ruled that victim-impact statements, which document the suffering of the victim and the victim's family that results from the crime, are admissible among the evidence to be considered by a jury during the sentencing phase of criminal trials.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 197 characters.