Question

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court find that there was a taking for which the property owner was entitled to compensation?
A. a new zoning law that totally prohibited a property owner from building a house
B. a 32-month building moratorium on lakefront property
C. a city ordinance that placed restrictions on the development of individual historic landmarks, resulting in petitioner's inability to build offices and causing several million dollars in damages
D. Both a and c

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.