Accounting
Anthropology
Archaeology
Art History
Banking
Biology & Life Science
Business
Business Communication
Business Development
Business Ethics
Business Law
Chemistry
Communication
Computer Science
Counseling
Criminal Law
Curriculum & Instruction
Design
Earth Science
Economic
Education
Engineering
Finance
History & Theory
Humanities
Human Resource
International Business
Investments & Securities
Journalism
Law
Management
Marketing
Medicine
Medicine & Health Science
Nursing
Philosophy
Physic
Psychology
Real Estate
Science
Social Science
Sociology
Special Education
Speech
Visual Arts
Question
Isolate and discuss the rhetorical devices that appear in the following passage:
I'm not among those who wonder why the senator hasn't made a full disclosure of his financial dealings prior to taking office.
Answer
This answer is hidden. It contains 9 characters.
Related questions
Q:
State whether the following item expresses moral value or nonmoral value; or no value at all.The carpenter's work in remodeling the kitchen was excellent.
Q:
State whether the following item expresses moral value or nonmoral value; or no value at all.Everybody has a legal right to an education.
Q:
State whether the following item expresses moral value or nonmoral value; or no value at all.The regime in China is harshly repressive.
Q:
State whether the following item expresses moral value or nonmoral value; or no value at all.The paint job on Linda's car is awfullooks as though somebody did it with a brush.
Q:
State whether the following item expresses moral value or nonmoral value; or no value at all.You should get rid of your dog's fleas so that it won't be miserable.
Q:
State whether the following item expresses moral value or nonmoral value; or no value at all.If you don't get rid of your dog's fleas, it's going to be miserable.
Q:
State whether the following item expresses moral value or nonmoral value; or no value at all.It is not in the best interests of the United States to intervene in local wars outside U.S. territory.
Q:
For the following, try to come up with an additional premise that will turn the passage into a deductively valid or an inductively strong argument. Usually this requires adding a general moral principle and, sometimes, an extra nonmoral claim as well. The idea is to guarantee that the "ought" claim follows from the "is" claim.The government should not proceed with Highway 99 expansion. This will make a lot of people lose their properties against their wishes.
Q:
State whether the following item expresses moral value or nonmoral value; or no value at all.Elliott delivered the presentation in an elegant manner.
Q:
Reasoning used by jurists and attorneys in applying the law is both deductive and inductive.
Q:
Utilitarianism holds the idea that what is right and wrong is merely a matter of subjective opinion.
Q:
In this pair of cases, the first may serve as precedent for the second. Decide whether the second case is so relevantly similar to the first that it should be decided identically. Explain your decision.
First case: The U.S. Supreme Court upheld federal regulations that bar abortion counseling at federally funded family-planning clinics in the United States.
Q:
In this pair of cases, the first may serve as precedent for the second. Decide whether the second case is so relevantly similar to the first that it should be decided identically. Explain your decision.First case: The owner of an amusement park, believing that homosexual activity was taking place in its pay toilets, authorized police to use an observation pipe leading from the roof to the booths. Officer H regularly visited the roof for surveillance. If he observed illegal conduct, he would notify officers below, who would make the arrest. A court ruled that the evidence of Officer H was illegally obtained and set aside the information.Second case: The management of a department store suspected illegal homosexual activity in the men's room. In this case, the booths, unlike those in the first case, were not pay toilets (and thus were not in the same sense "private"), and the observed behavior was committed in the space below the partition, and thus was observable by anyone who might have been in the public, or common-use, portion of the men's room at the time. An officer just happened to open the door of the men's room at the time of the activity, observed it through the doorway, and arrested the participants.
Q:
If you were a member of a state legislature, what kind of law might you write to prevent such situations as the preceding from arising? On what grounds would you justify it?
Q:
Answer the question in the following paragraph from one of the perspectives described in the text.Kevin's mother and father are divorced. Kevin is eight, and he lives with his father, John, for three months every summer. The rest of the time, except for occasional weekends, he lives two hundred miles away with his mother. John is the one with the problem: He and Kevin talked a lot last summer about getting a dog. For the first time, John is living in a house that has a backyard big enough to keep a dog and a fence around it as well. John had always used the "no place to keep it" line to avoid making promises, but that no longer applies. John finally promised to get Kevin a dog at the beginning of the next summer, and he knows Kevin is hoping to get one. In fact, John knows that Kevin is expecting a dog with enough confidence that (a) he'll be very disappointed if he doesn't get one, even though he may not say much about it. Furthermore, (b) not getting a dog will deprive both Kevin and John of considerable pleasure, since John knows how happy it would make his son to get one. But the danger of having a dog around is that John lives alone during most of the year, and having a dog means being responsible for another creature. (c) When John travels, as his job requires him to do from time to time, who will look after the dog? He can't leave it with a friend for a week or two at a time. And he has no neighbors close by who could look after it. It looks like a difficult trade-off: Three months a year of pleasure for John, Kevin, and a dog, balanced against what might be nine months a year of frequent unpleasantness for both John and the dog. What should he do?
Q:
In the following, discuss whether Marina is treating relevantly similar cases in sufficiently similar fashions; identify instances in which the cases are not relevantly similar.Marina tells her children to tell the truth, but she claims deductions on her income tax return to which she knows she is not legally entitled.
Q:
In the following, discuss whether Marina is treating relevantly similar cases in sufficiently similar fashions; identify instances in which the cases are not relevantly similar.Marina's automobile is a large, gas-guzzling, luxury car, but in some circumstances (such as cocktail parties when she is among strangers), she will make it a point to criticize people who drive such cars.
Q:
In the following, discuss whether Marina is treating relevantly similar cases in sufficiently similar fashions; identify instances in which the cases are not relevantly similar.Marina is the principal source of financial support for one of her sons at college; the other son won a large scholarship, and Marina sends him a much smaller amount.
Q:
Evaluate the issue of human cloning from the viewpoint of a deontologist (duty theorist).
Q:
State whether the reason given here is relevant according to any one of the aesthetic principles; and if it is relevant, identify the principle that makes it so.As Mimi sang her last aria, the audience was submerged in sadness.
Q:
State whether the reason given here is relevant according to any one of the aesthetic principles; and if it is relevant, identify the principle that makes it so.Raphael's painting is so illuminating because it manifests the Renaissance conviction that the realms of heaven and earth can be merged.
Q:
Suppose that the following pair of statements appears in a review of the same work of art. Identify which of the aesthetic principles referred to in the text each statement in the pair appeals to. Then state whether the principles are compatible and thus form the basis for a consistent review, or whether they are incompatible and cannot both be used in a consistent review.
a. Art that misleads us about reality is dangerous.
b. The great virtue of F. Scott Fitzgerald's novels is that they evoke a desire for a way of life that is extinctindeed, a kind of life that likely never was.
Q:
Suppose that the following pair of statements appears in a review of the same work of art. Identify which of the aesthetic principles referred to in the text each statement in the pair appeals to. Then state whether the principles are compatible and thus form the basis for a consistent review, or whether they are incompatible and cannot both be used in a consistent review.
a. A poem should not mean but be.
b. To appreciate Paradise Lost, it is essential to determine whether Milton meant Satan as a figure of evil, or as a liberated and thus attractively heroic figure.
Q:
Given the following position on abortion, identify which of the three major ethical theories discussed in the textutilitarianism, duty theory, or virtue ethicsit follows. Note that each theory may encompass several possible viewpoints on an issue.
Q:
Given the following position on euthanasia (doctor-assisted suicide), identify which of the three major ethical theories discussed in the textutilitarianism, duty theory, or virtue ethicsit follows. Note that each theory may encompass several possible viewpoints on an issue.
Active euthanasia should be legalized. After all, what are the overall consequences in terms of happiness or unhappiness? Euthanasia may not make the patient who wants to die happy, but at least it can end his or her misery. And although the relatives may feel unhappy at the assisted suicide, they too have suffered, and they will grieve whether the patient dies assisted or unassisted. As a matter of fact, they may grieve less if they know the patient has been spared a substantial amount of suffering.
Q:
Identify the moral perspective at work here:
At the supermarket, Vickie just ran her cart into a display of jars with jams and preserves, and now the aisle is full of broken glass and jam. She feels like leaving the store as quickly as possible. Is that an acceptable course of action?
Q:
For the following, try to come up with an additional premise that will turn the passage into a deductively valid or an inductively strong argument. Usually this requires adding a general moral principle and, sometimes, an extra nonmoral claim as well. The idea is to guarantee that the "ought" claim follows from the "is" claim.You shouldn't have included that material on the exam. It was never mentioned in class.
Q:
For the following, try to come up with an additional premise that will turn the passage into a deductively valid or an inductively strong argument. Usually this requires adding a general moral principle and, sometimes, an extra nonmoral claim as well. The idea is to guarantee that the "ought" claim follows from the "is" claim.Galileo's hypothesis should be suppressed. The biblical account in Ecclesiastes clearly states that the sun rises and sets and hastens to the place where it will rise again.
Q:
For the following, try to come up with an additional premise that will turn the passage into a deductively valid or an inductively strong argument. Usually this requires adding a general moral principle and, sometimes, an extra nonmoral claim as well. The idea is to guarantee that the "ought" claim follows from the "is" claim.In 1965, there were 47,000 road fatalities in the United States. By 1984, there were only 44,250 fatalities, but that is still far too many. The reductions between 1965 and 1984 were due primarily to federal requirements for motor vehicle safety. So, even stricter federal safety controls should be required.
Q:
For the following, try to come up with an additional premise that will turn the passage into a deductively valid or an inductively strong argument. Usually this requires adding a general moral principle and, sometimes, an extra nonmoral claim as well. The idea is to guarantee that the "ought" claim follows from the "is" claim.
"You shouldn't have criticized David so harshly; his mistake was a trivial one."
The severity of one's criticism should match the severity of the mistake criticized.