Question

MATCHING.
COLUMN 1COLUMN 2
1. Self-incriminationa. Evidence that will change or evaporate in a manner that will destroy its evidentiary value.
2. Bailb. An exception to the warrant to search requirement which says that consent to enter given to an undercover police officer or informant transfers to others in the police force who may then enter without a warrant.
3. Consent once removedc. The act of admitting guilt to a crime.
4. Exigent circumstancesd. The "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine that prohibits the admission of evidence obtained illegally at a defendant's criminal trial.
5. Stop and friske. Situations that require urgent action, sufficient to excuse delay to get a warrant.
6. Evanescent evidencef. The act of giving testimony against one's penal interest.
7. Exclusionary ruleg. The right not to testify against their own interests when accused of a crime.
8. Right to Remain Silenth. Police officers may briefly stop, identify, and frisk persons reasonably believed to have committed a crime during the course of an investigation.
9. Rebuttable presumptioni. Money or other guarantee posted to assure a defendant who is released form custody pending trial or appeal will appear when called or forfeit the security posted.
10. Confessionj. A presumption that can be overcome by presenting evidence to the contrary

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 41 characters.