Question

Matchless Clothing Company buys clothing assembled by Nantra, Ltd., a for­eign firm that employs young children for long hours and low pay. Nantra's na­tion does not enforce its child labor laws. Human International Politics (HIP), a political activist organization, discovers Matchless's connection to Nantra and plans to reveal this information. Before HIP does so, however, Matchless publicly releases the informa­tion itself and announces that it is severing its relationship with Nantra. Matchless publicizes its action in its advertising, and the company's sales and profits increase, apparently as a direct result. Has Matchless acted unethically in any way? From an ethical perspective, is Matchless's conduct in this situation more important than whatever its mo­tive might be?

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1055 characters.