Question


(p. 96) What did the King I and King II reports have in common?

A. They both limited their scope to the financial and regulatory accountability of corporations.

B. They both advocated following the traditional, single bottom line of profitability.

C. They both rejected the triple bottom line suggested by the Cadbury approach.

D. They both incorporated a code of corporate practices that looked beyond corporations.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.