Question


(p. 97) Why was the "comply or explain" approach to corporate governance problematic?

A. It was too strict and fined corporations that did not conform to its standards heavily.

B. It did not permit corporations to express why they chose not to comply with certain rules.

C. Its definition of what constitutes an acceptable explanation for not complying was vague.

D. It expected corporations to abide by an extremely rigid set of operating standards.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.