Question

"Seeing Privilege Where It Isn"t: Marginalized Masculinities and the Intersectionality of Privilege", Bethany M. Coston and Michael Kimmel
Coston and Kimmel take a different approach to studying intersectionality and privilege, in this case the way in which a class with privilege (males) intersects with one without (disabled, gay, and working class). They theorize that the reason for this intersectional marginalization is that all three classes remove some element of masculinity: physical prowess for the disabled, the dominant role in sexuality for gay men, and expendability in the case of working class men. The primary focus becomes that privilege too is not a dichotomous, black and white issue, but also one subject to intersectionality.
Which of the following is NOT a way in which disabled males may cope with their marginalization?
a. Reject their own masculinity
b. Promote certain hegemonical ideals
c. Reformulate their idea of masculinity
d. Reject mass societal norms and deny their importance

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.