Question

The right to be represented at a criminal trial by a competent attorney is widely viewed as fundamental in a modern democracy. However, the Supreme Court has recognized this right only relatively recently, making it binding on the states. How has the right to counsel evolved over time? Discuss the Supreme Court cases that have extended the right to counsel to indigents. At what stages are the criminally accused entitled to counsel? Do you agree with the Court's reasoning regarding the stages at which counsel should be provided? In your opinion, is the right to counsel essential to a fair trial? Should the right to counsel be extended beyond criminal trials to include civil trials as well? Does the right to represent oneself outweigh the need for counsel? Should counsel be provided to individuals over their expressed wishes to represent themselves?

Answer


*A. Varies