Question

What was the result in Scott v. Mid-Carolina Homes Inc., the case in the text in which the defendant attempted to rescind a contract to sell a mobile home because its salesperson was acting under a mistake of fact when he gave the plaintiff the sales price?

A. The seller was allowed to rescind the contract because a unilateral contract was involved.

B. The seller was allowed to rescind the contract because a bilateral contract was involved.

C. The seller was allowed to rescind the contract because the mistake involved a price differential of over 25%.

D. The seller was allowed to rescind the contract because the mistake involved a price differential of over 50%.

E. The seller was not allowed to rescind the contract.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 500 characters.