Accounting
Anthropology
Archaeology
Art History
Banking
Biology & Life Science
Business
Business Communication
Business Development
Business Ethics
Business Law
Chemistry
Communication
Computer Science
Counseling
Criminal Law
Curriculum & Instruction
Design
Earth Science
Economic
Education
Engineering
Finance
History & Theory
Humanities
Human Resource
International Business
Investments & Securities
Journalism
Law
Management
Marketing
Medicine
Medicine & Health Science
Nursing
Philosophy
Physic
Psychology
Real Estate
Science
Social Science
Sociology
Special Education
Speech
Visual Arts
Business Law
Q:
In a strict liability case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant breached a duty.
Q:
Proximate causation presupposes the existence of actual or but-for causation; you can't have the former without the latter.
Q:
Unforeseeable acts are held to be an intervening cause.
Q:
Negligent defendants are never liable for the consequences of an unforeseeable intervening cause.
Q:
The doctrine of "Res ipsa loquitur" means the thing speaks for others.
Q:
Generally, property owners do not owe a duty of care to trespassers, who regularly enter the land without authorization.
Q:
Negligence per se is defined as negligence where one party is a citizen of a foreign nation.
Q:
Whatever the type of injury experienced by the plaintiff, the usual rule is that only punitive damages are recoverable in a negligence case.
Q:
The "modified impact rule" does not require an element of direct physical contact.
Q:
Social guests are licensees in some states.
Q:
If an individual can foresee that his/her actions will cause a risk of harm to another, then the individual has a duty to protect that other person from harm.
Q:
In many cases, a blind person will be held to a different standard of reasonable care than a person who can see.
Q:
Special duties that run from possessors of real estate to those who enter that property are called "premises liability" cases.
Q:
As a prank, Joe signs Susan's name to a pro-abortion petition that appears in a local newspaper. Susan is passionately opposed to abortion. Thus, Susan sues Joe for both defamation and for putting her in a false light in the public eye. Is Joe liable for either tort? If it matters, assume that the town in question is a fairly liberal one with lots of abortion supporters.
Q:
A person distributes unsolicited e-mails to large numbers of employees of the company.
He does so illegally from the company's e-mail system without consent of the company. Has the distributor committed tort of trespass to personal property?
Q:
The tort of negligent hiring is distinct from tort liability predicated upon the doctrine of respondeat superior.
Q:
Negligence is conduct by an individual that fails to protect others from the risk of harm.
Q:
Under the theory of negligence law, each person must act as a reasonable person of ordinary prudence.
Q:
Ann is troubled with the noise of the old generator set up by her neighbor Jose at his residence. The noise the generator makes is unbearable. Ann sues Jose for nuisance. Will she succeed?
A. No, because it is reasonable noise.
B. No, because generator is not her personal property.
C. No, because she cannot interfere with Jose's personal matters.
D. Yes, because the noise is interfering with plaintiff's use and enjoyment of land.
Q:
Which of the following is most likely to be classed as a nuisance (rather than as a trespass to land)?
A. Firing a machine gun through an adjoining landowner's airspace.
B. Allowing thick smoke from your manufacturing operations to continually drift over an adjoining landowner's land.
C. Leaving smelly, unsanitary garbage on your ex-landlord's land after the expiration of your lease.
D. Chasing another person onto an adjoining landowner's land.
Q:
_____ to land may be defined as any unauthorized or unprivileged intentional intrusion upon another's real property.
A. Trespass
B. Nuisance
C. Conversion
D. Battery
Q:
Which of the following is generally true regarding the tort of conversion?
A. It involves both real property (land and interests in land) and personal property.
B. As its name implies, conversion always involves the transformation of the plaintiff's property into something elsee.g., its destruction, alteration, etc.
C. A defendant who buys or sells stolen property may be liable for conversion even if she does so in good faith and without knowledge of the theft.
D. Conversion involves all interferences with the plaintiff's property rightswhether serious or nonserious.
Q:
After a student named Bob insults him in class, Marvin, a business law professor, pulls out his .38-revolver and fires a shot at the student. The shot misses the first student, but strikes another student named Cathy, who never saw the shot coming and never knew what hit her. Bob and Cathy sue Marvin for assault and battery. Who can recover for what? Why?
Q:
_____ affords a remedy for the wrongful institution of criminal proceedings.
A. Abuse of process
B. Malicious prosecution
C. Wrongful use of civil proceedings
D. Deceit
Q:
Ingmar wanted to buy Otto's land. Otto did not want to sell. In order to pressure Otto into selling the land, Ingmar brought a private nuisance lawsuit against Otto. In this case, Ingmar has probably committed the tort of:
A. abuse of process.
B. malicious prosecution.
C. defamation.
D. deceit.
Q:
The defendant's intentional exercise of dominion or control over the plaintiff's personal property without the plaintiff's consent is called:
A. defamation.
B. conversion.
C. interference.
D. libel.
Q:
Which of the following is most likely to involve liability for violating the so-called "right of publicity"? In each case, assume that the plaintiff's name, likeness, work, etc. was appropriated without the plaintiff's permission.
A. Using the work of an unknown artist to illustrate the T-shirts one makes and sells.
B. Using the picture of the owner to sell beer at a pub.
C. Using a picture of a race car to sell chewing tobacco.
D. Using Madonna's name to sell women's apparel.
Q:
Which of the following is least likely to create liability for the first form of invasion of privacy (intrusion on personal solitude or seclusion)?
A. Using binoculars to look from your apartment into a neighbor's bedroom.
B. Tapping someone's telephone, because this is a nonphysical intrusion.
C. Examining someone's bank account.
D. Examining public records concerning a person.
Q:
Which of the following is true of invasion of privacy'?
A. Public figures do not enjoy any right to privacy.
B. There are four distinct torts related to it.
C. It is a subject of the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
D. Examining a person's public records amounts to an invasion of privacy.
Q:
Which of the following is NOT one of the four distinct torts that make up the invasion of privacy cause of action?
A. Intrusion on Solitude
B. Breach of Contract
C. Public Disclosure of Private Facts
D. False Light Publicity
Q:
Which of the following is most likely to involve both defamation liability and liability for putting a person in a false light?
A. Saying that a philosopher favors Plato's philosophy over Aristotle's, when in fact the reverse is true.
B. Falsely saying that an anti-abortion activist favors a candidate that is conservative and is anti-abortion.
C. Falsely saying that an anti-abortion activist favors giving parents a right of infanticide for all children less than one year old.
D. Signing a conservative Christian clergyman's name to a petition advocating greater sexual freedom for homosexuals which the clergyman supports the petition in private.
Q:
Which of the following draws on the personal property right connected with a person's identity and her exclusive right to control it?
A. Writing a political editorial on a public figure
B. Signing a person's name on a petition that he/she is against
C. Commercially using someone's name
D. Spreading malicious gossip about a well-known person
Q:
Most defamation cases brought by public official or public figure plaintiffs are won by the defendant, because the plaintiff was unable to prove:
A. damages due to defamation.
B. actual malice.
C. defendant made the statements.
D. the actual statements were untrue.
Q:
In which of the following cases is it most likely that a plaintiff will only have to prove negligence on the defendant's part to recover for defamation?
A. Statements that a U.S. Senator had someone killed while in office.
B. Statements that Madonna had someone killed.
C. A statement that you or I murdered an innocent person during a robbery.
D. A credit report on a construction contractor.
Q:
Which of the following can recover damages for proven actual injury, but not presumed or punitive damages, by proving only fault?
A. A public official plaintiff involved in a subject of public concern
B. A public figure plaintiff involved in a subject of private concern
C. A private figure plaintiff involved in a subject of public concern
D. A private figure plaintiff involved in a subject of private concern
Q:
"Books are Us" (BU), a bookstore, is being sued for defamation after it sold a book containing false, defamatory statements about the plaintiff. What is BU's best defense to this lawsuit?
A. BU is not the publisher of the book.
B. BU did not intend to harm the plaintiff.
C. BU had no knowledge of the contents of the book.
D. BU did not violate any criminal law or regulation in selling the book.
Q:
Dave tells Dora that Phil, a financial advisor, has been stealing money from his clients. Dora then repeats Dave's statement to Tom, telling Tom that the information comes from Dave. All these statements are oral, defamatory, and false. Phil sues Dave and Dora for defamation. Which of the following is true? (Don't consider defenses and privileges).
A. Phil can recover against Dave and Dora without proving special damages.
B. Because Dora only repeated Dave's statement and identified Dave as its author, she can't be liable to Phil.
C. Because Dave only communicated his statement to Dora, and not to an appreciable number of people, he can't be liable to Phil.
D. Phil must prove special damages in order to recover against Dave and Dora.
Q:
A(n) ______ shields the author of a defamatory statement regardless of his/her knowledge, motive, or intent.
A. demurrer
B. transferred intent
C. intentional tort
D. absolute privilege
Q:
Which of the following is an example of the privilege of statements made to protect or further the legitimate interests of another?
A. Employment reference
B. Intracorporate communications
C. Accurate media reports
D. Opinion polls
Q:
The difference between a public figure and a private one regarding defamation cases is that:
A. only the public figure can file a case.
B. the private figure generally loses such cases.
C. the public figure has to prove "actual malice."
D. the private figure does not enjoy conditional privileges.
Q:
In general, liability for defamation requires:
A. widespread communication of the defamatory statement.
B. communication of the defamatory statement from the plaintiff herself.
C. publication of the defamatory statement.
D. the identification of the source of the defamatory statement.
Q:
The common law has, traditionally, allowed plaintiffs to recover for libel without proof of _____.
A. punitive damages
B. criminal damages
C. liquidated damages
D. actual damages
Q:
An essential element of the tort is that the alleged defamatory statement must be "of and concerning" the plaintiff. Why?
A. It is extremely difficult to prove.
B. It places a burden on the defendant.
C. It aims to protect reputation.
D. It concerns public figures.
Q:
Humorous or satirical accounts ordinarily are not considered to be defamation unless:
A. a reasonable reader believes them to be real events.
B. they are political in nature.
C. the plaintiff can prove that they are about him/her.
D. they expressly state so.
Q:
Adam published his personal opinion about the current condition of politics stating, "Though the government is unable to fulfill the demands of the public, they demand votes; they really are beggars on streets." Can politicians sue him for defamation under tort?
A. No, because as a general rule the material in a newspaper is totally exempted.
B. Yes, because defamation in a newspaper is always a tort.
C. Yes, because Adam wrote even though he did not have authority.
D. No, because statements of pure opinion do not amount to defamation.
Q:
Store owners' "conditional privilege" defense against intentional tort claims brought by detained shoplifting suspects, recognized by most states, usually:
A. requires that the store owner act with police consent.
B. requires that the store owner act with written consent of suspects.
C. requires that the store owner act on evidence against suspect.
D. requires that the store owner act with reasonable cause.
Q:
Jack was an employee of ABC Corp. Harry, the president of ABC, had reasonable grounds to believe that Jack had stolen money from the corporation. ABC fired Jack. One month later, Jack applied for employment at DEF Corp. The vice president for Human Relations at DEF contacted Harry and asked about Jack's performance at ABC. Harry responded, "I believe that Jack stole money while working here". DEF declined to hire Jack. Jack later discovered what Harry had said, and is now suing Harry for defamation. What is the likely outcome of this case?
A. Jack will win because Harry's statement harmed him.
B. Jack will win because Harry did not have absolute proof that Jack had stolen money.
C. Harry will win because he had a conditional privilege to make that statement.
D. Harry will win because he had an absolute privilege to comment on a former employee's performance.
Q:
Which of the following is slander rather than libel?
A. A defamatory statue
B. An oral defamatory statement
C. A defamatory magazine article
D. A defamatory TV broadcast
Q:
Libel is distinct from slander, in that, libel:
A. involves views on public figures.
B. involves only content in print.
C. involves only content on the Internet.
D. is more permanent in nature.
Q:
The necessary intent for assault is the same as that required for battery, which is to cause:
A. loss of reputation
B. offensive contact
C. conversion of one's property
D. contractual breach
Q:
In an assault case, it is irrelevant:
A. whether the threatened contact actually occurs.
B. whether there is any intent or not.
C. whether there is an apprehension of harmful contact.
D. whether there is any reasonable apprehension of imminent battery.
Q:
What tort defined in the Restatement (Second) of Torts requires behavior that is "so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency"?
A. Battery
B. Assault
C. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
D. Conversion of Property
Q:
Which of the following characterizes false imprisonment?
A. Unintentional confinement of a person with consent
B. Partial confinement of a person by blocking an exit, when several exist
C. Intentional confinement of a person with consent
D. Unfounded assertion of legal authority to detain a person
Q:
Davis throws a dagger at Smith, intending to kill Smith. However, the dagger misses Smith and strikes the hat on Potter's head. The dagger does not make contact with Potter's body. Unharmed but finding the whole thing offensive, Potter sues Davis for battery. Which of the following is most true?
A. Davis is not liable because he did not intend to make contact with Potter.
B. Davis is liable to Potter for negligence.
C. Davis is not liable because Potter did not suffer any physical harm.
D. Davis is liable to Potter for battery.
Q:
What type of damages is awarded to an injured party in a tort case to cover damages for the harm that the injured party suffered?
A. Compensatory Damages
B. Punitive Damages
C. Criminal Fines
D. Liquidated Damages
Q:
_____ are intended to punish flagrant wrongdoers and to deter them.
A. Compensatory damages
B. Punitive damages
C. Liquidated damages
D. Tort damages
Q:
Melissa hurls a rock with the intention to hit Dave, with whom she has just fought. The rock hits Stacey, instead, who is sitting next to Dave. Melissa is liable for battery under the clause of:
A. conversion.
B. private nuisance.
C. actual malice.
D. transferred intent.
Q:
_____ is the failure to use reasonable care, with harm to another party occurring as a result.
A. Assault
B. Recklessness
C. Negligence
D. Liability
Q:
What is the standard of proof that the plaintiff must satisfy in a tort case?
A. Preponderance of the evidence
B. Beyond-a-reasonable-doubt
C. Benefit of assumption
D. Burden of proof
Q:
Sounds that reverberate across the plaintiff's land are more likely to be classed as a nuisance than as a trespass to land.
Q:
In order to be liable for conversion, the defendant must know that the property rightfully belongs to someone else.
Q:
Nuisance involves the invasion of another's property.
Q:
_____ is defined as the desire to cause certain consequences or the substantial certainty that those consequences will result from one's behavior.
A. Intent
B. Negligence
C. Liability
D. Battery
Q:
In order to prove actual malice in a defamation claim, the plaintiff must show that the defendant had knowledge of the falsity of the statement.
Q:
There is no tort liability for fraud or deceit where the defendant did not actively make a false statement, but instead merely failed to disclose something.
Q:
If one individual opens the mail of another without permission to do so, then the injured party can sue under the tort law theory of invasion of privacy.
Q:
If one individual signed another's name to a petition for a political and social issue that the person had deep moral objections to, then that injured party could sue under the theory of invasion of privacy.
TRUE
Publicity that places a person in a false light in the public eye can be an invasion of privacy. An example would be if someone were to sign one person's name to a public petition for a cause that deeply offended and hurt the victim.
Q:
The tort of malicious prosecution affords a remedy when the defendant mounted a wrongful and unjustifiable civil suit against the plaintiff.
Q:
In the case of false imprisonment, the plaintiff must be under confinement for a long time.
FALSE
Q:
Television and radio broadcasts usually are classified as slander rather than as libel because they involve spoken words rather than written ones.
Q:
Generally speaking, statements made during judicial proceedings are absolutely privileged and, therefore, shield against defamation liability.
Q:
Defamation liability requires publication of the defamatory statement to an appreciable number of people.
Q:
Public figure Pam sues a newspaper for defamation based on statements regarding her stand on a public issue. Pam must prove the newspaper's "actual malice" in order to recover any damage.
Q:
A valid defense for battery is the free and intelligent consent given.
Q:
If one party threatens to commit battery on another individual tomorrow, then this is an assault.
Q:
A tort is a civil wrong which is also the same as breach of contract.
Q:
With a tort the government, either the State or Federal government, prosecutes an individual for a harm to society.
Q:
Under the principle of "Respondeat Superior," an employer is not liable for torts committed by employees.
Q:
Punitive damages are not meant to compensate victims for their injuries.
Q:
For a battery to exist, the victim must be aware of a harmful or offensive contact at the time that contact occurs.