Accounting
Anthropology
Archaeology
Art History
Banking
Biology & Life Science
Business
Business Communication
Business Development
Business Ethics
Business Law
Chemistry
Communication
Computer Science
Counseling
Criminal Law
Curriculum & Instruction
Design
Earth Science
Economic
Education
Engineering
Finance
History & Theory
Humanities
Human Resource
International Business
Investments & Securities
Journalism
Law
Management
Marketing
Medicine
Medicine & Health Science
Nursing
Philosophy
Physic
Psychology
Real Estate
Science
Social Science
Sociology
Special Education
Speech
Visual Arts
Business Law
Q:
Any point source emitting pollutants into water must have a permit.
Q:
Those who knowingly violate the Clean Air Act are exempt from criminal penalties.
Q:
Performance standards for major sources of air pollution require the use of the any available technology, or AAT.
Q:
The Environmental Protection lists all hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) on a prioritized schedule.
Q:
Different standards for air quality apply to existing sources of pollution and major new sources.
Q:
The primary responsibility for preventing and controlling air pollution rests with the federal government.
Q:
The Environmental Protection Agency has concluded that greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide emissions, do not constitute a public danger.
Q:
There are no plans to develop national standards regulating the fuel economy and emissions for medium- and heavy-duty trucks.
Q:
The Environmental Protection Agency periodically updates the air pollution standards.
Q:
An environmental impact statement is required for every major federal action that significantly affects the quality of the environment.
Q:
Injured individuals can rely on the common law to obtain damages and injunctions against business polluters.
Q:
A collection agency must include a validation notice whenever it initially contacts a debtor for payment of a debt.
Q:
Major credit reporting agencies must provide consumers with free copies of their own credit reports every twelve months.
Q:
A credit-card company is not required to provide advance notice to consumers before changing credit-card terms.
Q:
A credit-cardholder is liable for all unauthorized charges made before the creditor is notified that the card has been lost.
Q:
The key federal statute regulating the credit and credit-card industries is basically a disclosure law.
Q:
Manufacturers are required to report on any products intended for sale if the products have proved to be hazardous.
Q:
Merchants must ship orders within the time promised in their ads.
Q:
Merchants must issue a refund within a specified period of time when a consumer cancels an order.
Q:
Labels on vegetables and fruits are not required to indicate where the food originated.
Q:
Food labels are not required to provide standard nutrition facts.
Q:
Labels must use words that are easily understood by the ordinary marketing executive.
Q:
Counteradvertising requires a company to advertise the products of its competitor to counter its own false claims.
Q:
All adsboth online and offlinemust be truthful.
Q:
Bait-and-switch advertising occurs when an ad appears to be based on factual evidence but in fact is not reasonably supported by evidence.
Q:
Vague generalities and obvious exaggerations constitute deceptive advertising.
Q:
Advertising will not be deemed deceptive so long as it appears to be based on factual evidence, even if it is not.
Q:
Common law judicial decisions that serve to protect the interests of consumers are not classified as consumer law.
Q:
An agreement that is deemed a per se violation will be examined by a court to determine whether the agreement's benefits outweigh its anticompetitive effects.
Q:
An act must substantially affect interstate commerce to violate antitrust law.
Q:
The basic purpose of antitrust law is to regulate economic competition.
Q:
A restraint of trade is an agreement between firms that has the effect of reducing competition in the marketplace.
Q:
The Sherman Act, the Clayton Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act are all examples of legislation designed to curb anticompetitive business practices.
Q:
Antitrust legislation was created because of the belief that competition leads to lower prices.
Q:
Bubbly Bottling Company is engaged in the soft-drink bottling and distribution industry in the states of New York and New Jersey. The firm currently has about 40 percent of the market for these products and related services. Carbonate Distribution Corporation competes with Bubbly in the same states. Carbonate has about 35 percent of the market. If Bubbly were to acquire the stock and assets of Carbonate, would Bubbly be in violation of any of the antitrust laws? If so, which one? Discuss fully.
Q:
Java Bean Company imports coffee beans and sells them under two-year contracts to Mellow Roast, Inc., and other coffeemakers. The contracts require that during the two-year term a coffeemaker not buy beans from Java Bean's competitors. The contracts do not limit the coffeemakers' purchase of tea or other beverage ingredients from other suppliers, however. In the second year of the contract, Mellow Roast protests that this arrangement violates antitrust law. Is Mellow Roast correct? If not, why not? If so, under which antitrust statute, or statutes, could these contracts be held illegal?
Q:
Big U.S. Oil Company joins with a foreign cartel to control the price of oil. If the cartel has a substantial effect on U.S. commerce
a. both Big U.S. Oil and the foreign cartel can be sued for violation of U.S. antitrust laws.
b. neither Big U.S. Oil nor the foreign cartel can be sued for violation of U.S. antitrust laws.
c. only Big U.S. Oil can be sued for violation of U.S. antitrust laws.
d. only the foreign cartel can be sued for violation of U.S. antitrust laws
Q:
Mango Corporation believes that Melon Corporation engages in anticompetitive behavior in an attempt to drive Mango and its other competitors out of the market. Antitrust laws can be enforced against Melon by
a. Mango and its competitors only.
b. Mango, its competitors, and the Federal Trade Commission only.
c. Mango, its competitors, the Federal Trade Commission, and the U.S. Department of Justice.
d. the Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice only.
Q:
Global Services Corporation engages in trade practices that may violate antitrust law. The Federal Trade Commission has the power to act against unfair trade practices under
a. the Clayton Act.
b. the Federal Trade Commission Act.
c. the Sherman Act.
d. no law.
Q:
Luminescent Silicon Corporation, which controls 40 percent of the computer-chip market in the United States, merges with Micro Processors, Inc., which controls 15 percent of the same market. This merger is a violation
a. only if the result more clearly concentrates the market.
b. only if the result makes it more difficult for potential competitors to enter the market.
c. if the result more clearly concentrates the market and makes it more difficult for potential competitors to enter the market.
d. under no circumstances.
Q:
City Manufacturing Corporation conditions shipments of its products to Exurb Stores, Inc., on Exurb's agreement not to buy products from Regional Works Company, City's competitor. This is
a. an exclusive-dealing contract.
b. a tying arrangement.
c. price discrimination.
d. a unilateral refusal to deal.
Q:
To drive its competitors out of a certain geographic segment of its market, Fryin" Potatoes, Inc., sets the prices of its products below cost for the buyers in that area. This is
a. a refusal to deal.
b. business acumen.
c. predatory bidding.
d. price discrimination.
Q:
HVAC Parts Company charges different buyers different prices for identical goods. HVAC's prices are subject to evaluation under
a. the Clayton Act.
b. the Federal Trade Commission Act.
c. the Sherman Act.
d. no antitrust law.
Q:
Precious Metals Corporation, a raw materials vendor, sells its commodities in certain quantities to Quarry Refining Company for a certain price but charges Rich Assets, Inc., a Quarry competitor, a higher price. This is most likely a violation of
a. the Clayton Act.
b. the Federal Trade Commission Act.
c. the Sherman Act.
d. no antitrust law.
Q:
A unilateral refusal to deal can violate antitrust laws if the refusal
a. is likely to have an anticompetitive effect on a particular market.
b. results in lower prices for consumers.
c. provides no economic benefits for consumers.
d. is likely to increase competition.
Q:
Fresh Vegetables, Inc., a wholesaler, refuses to sell its produce to Good Mart Stores, Inc., a retailer. This is
a. "an unfair or deceptive act or practice."
b. a per se violation.
c. not a violation.
d. subject to analysis under the rule of reason.
Q:
An antitrust action is brought against Tri-State Transport Company, alleging the offense of attempted monopolization. To be guilty of this offense, Tri-State's attempt must have
a. a dangerous probability of success.
b. a deadly guaranty of success.
c. a distant possibility of success.
d. a distinct improbability of success.
Q:
Rally Speedboat Corporation refuses to sell its products to Super Weekends, Inc., a recreational water products dealership. This is
a. an exclusive-dealing contract.
b. a horizontal market division.
c. attempted monopolization.
d. a unilateral refusal to deal.
Q:
To acquire monopoly power in its market, Perfect Plastics, Inc., sets its prices lower than its competitors. Under the Sherman Act, this is
a. a per se violation.
b. a violation if its competitors make similar deals.
c. a violation if it thereby acquires monopoly power.
d. not a violation.
Q:
Master Manufacturing Corporation has exclusive control over the market for its product. Under the Sherman Act, this is
a. a per se violation.
b. a violation if it acquired this power through "business acumen."
c. a violation if it acquired this power through "anticompetitive means."
d. not a violation.
Q:
A suit is filed against Dormroom Furniture Unlimited, Inc., alleging that the firm has committed the offense of monopolization. To determine whether Dormroom has committed this offense, the court will consider the extent of Dormroom's market power and
a. how Dormroom acquired its power.
b. how Dormroom makes its products.
c. Dormroom's customers.
d. Dormroom's suppliers.
Q:
Listen Up! Corporation books and promotes concerts and other entertainment events, for which Listen Up! also sells tickets. In weighing a challenge to Listen Up!'s "monopolistic" ticket prices, a court looks at the relevant geographic market. This encompasses
a. only areas in which Listen Up! does not have monopoly power.
b. only areas in which Listen Up! has monopoly power.
c. the area in which Listen Up! and its competitors sell, and their customers buy, the tickets.
d. the entire United States in all cases.
Q:
A suit is filed against Adroit Drilling Tools Corporation, alleging that the firm committed the offense of monopolization. To determine whether Adroit has monopoly power requires looking at
a. the definition of monopoly in the Sherman Act.
b. Adroit's size alone.
c. Adroit's production methods and marketing techniques.
d. the relevant market.
Q:
Imperio Caffeine Corporation makes and sells coffee under a variety of brand names. Imperio wants to merge with Java Company, its main competitor. In weighing a challenge to the deal, a court looks at the relevant product market. This most likely includes coffee and
a. no other products.
b. products that are not identical but are related, such as spin-offs.
c. products that are sometimes substituted for coffee.
d. products with identical attributes only.
Q:
Marvin is a very good businessman. He starts Marvin's Bike Company in the small town of Wheatland, South Dakota. There is one other bike store in Wheatland. Through good business management, Marvin's Bike Company obtains a great deal of market power in Wheatland. This acquisition of monopoly power is
a. a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
b. an illegal restraint on trade.
c. not an antitrust violation.
d. a per se violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
Q:
Gourmet Foods, Inc., requires all distributors of its products to sell them at a specified minimum price. Under the Sherman Act, this is a violation
a. if the anticompetitive effects outweigh the competitive benefits.
b. if the competitive benefits outweigh the anticompetitive effects.
c. under any circumstances.
d. under no circumstances.
Q:
Spa Selectiva Company makes and sells beauty salon supplies. By selling its product at prices substantially below the normal cost of production, Spa Selectiva hopes to drive its competitors from the market. This is
a. market power.
b. predatory pricing.
c. price discrimination.
d. price-fixing.
Q:
A trade association
a. is always a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
b. may be legal if it is sufficiently beneficial to both the association and the public.
c. is an innovative, legally efficient approach to doing business.
d. always creates illegal territorial or customer restrictions.
Q:
Organic Cheeses, Inc., Fine & Fresh Foods Company, and Healthy Whole Foods, Inc. organize together to exchange information and share advertising. This is an example of a
a. trade association.
b. resale price maintenance agreement.
c. monopoly.
d. territorial restriction.
Q:
Lightning Cycles, Inc., makes Lightning-brand motorcycles and accessories, which are distributed to authorized dealers, including Macho Motors, Inc. Macho operates dealerships in several locations. Lightning imposes restrictions on Macho to limit the areas in which they sell the bikes and insulate other dealers from direct competition. This is
a. a territorial restriction.
b. a resale price maintenance agreement.
c. a refusal to deal.
d. a price-fixing agreement.
Q:
Some agreements are so blatantly and substantially anticompetitive that they are deemed illegal per se under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Which of the following is not a per se violation?
a. A price-fixing agreement
b. A group boycott
c. A trade association
d. A market division
Q:
Edgy Engine Components, Inc., a maker of vehicle parts, refuses to sell to Fidgety Fix-It, Inc., a national vehicle service firm. Edgy Engine convinces Greasy Motor Parts Company, a competitor, to do the same. This is
a. a group boycott.
b. a market division.
c. a joint venture.
d. an exclusive-dealing contract.
Q:
Gulf Air, Inc., is the major wholesale distributor of software in the state of Florida. Its closest competitor is Fluid Systems Company, another Florida firm. The two firms agree that Gulf Air will operate in south Florida and Fluid Systems will operate in north Florida. This is
a. a group boycott.
b. a market division.
c. a joint venture.
d. an exclusive-dealing contract.
Q:
Cardio, Inc., makes and sells Drawdown, the most prescribed name-brand heart medication. Emitate Corporation has the potential to make a generic version of the same drug.
A court would most likely rule that the agreement between Cardio and Emitate is
a. a deal that neither restrains trade or harms competition.
b. a legal restraint of trade.
c. a per se violation of the Sherman Act.
d. subject to analysis under the rule of reason.
Q:
Cardio, Inc., makes and sells Drawdown, the most prescribed name-brand heart medication. Emitate Corporation has the potential to make a generic version of the same drug.
Cardio pays Emitate not to sell its product. This is
a. a customer restriction.
b. a joint venture.
c. an exclusive-dealing contract.
d. a price-fixing agreement.
Q:
A court deems an agreement between Silver Saddles Saddlery and Time Tested Tack, Inc. to be a per se violation of the Sherman Act. The court is
a. prevented from determining whether the agreement's benefits outweigh its anticompetitive effects.
b. required to unanimously decide whether the agreement's benefits outweigh its anticompetitive effects.
c. required to apply the rule of reason.
d. required to issue a formal complaint against Silver Saddles and Time Tested Tack.
Q:
When applying the rule of reason to determine whether an agreement violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act, a court will not consider
a. the purpose of the agreement.
b. the parties' market ability to implement the agreement.
c. the effect of the agreement on international trade.
d. the potential effect of the agreement on competition.
Q:
Thermo Gas, Inc., and Uno Oil Corporation refine and sell gasoline and other petroleum products. To limit the supply of gas on the market and thereby raise prices, Thermo Gas and Uno Oil agree to buy "excess" supplies from dealers and "dispose" of it. This is
a. a deal that neither restrains trade or harms competition.
b. a legal restraint of trade.
c. a per se violation of the Sherman Act.
d. subject to analysis under the rule of reason.
Q:
To fall under the Sherman Act, an activity must
a. substantially affect interstate commerce.
b. involve monopolization.
c. promote competition.
d. involve international trade.
Q:
North Mining Company and South Excavation Company agree to abide by the decisions of East Coast Financial Corporation as to their respective levels of production, markets, and prices, effectively reducing competition and increasing profits. This is most likely
a. a common, legal, time-honored type of business arrangement.
b. an illegal restraint on trade.
c. an innovative, legally efficient approach to doing business.
d. an outdated, but legal business trust.
Q:
Congress enacts a statute to outlaw a specific type of anticompetitive business agreement. Like other laws that regulate economic competition, this law is referred to as
a. a federal trade commission act.
b. an antitrust law.
c. an interstate commerce act.
d. a suppressive restraint on trade.
Q:
Cooperative research by small-business firms is exempt from antitrust law.
Q:
Insurance companies are exempt from antitrust laws whenever state regulation exists.
Q:
Labor unions can organize and bargain without violating antitrust law.
Q:
A divestiture is an order to a company to cease, or divest itself of, its anticompetitive conduct.
Q:
No person may be a director for two competing corporations at the same time.
Q:
Market concentration refers to the number of firms in the market.
Q:
In determining the legality of a merger, a crucial consideration is market concentration.
Q:
Conditioning the sale of one product on the purchase of another is an exclusive-dealing contract.
Q:
Under an exclusive-dealing contract, a seller promises a buyer a certain territory in which the buyer will have no direct competition.